|

Page last updated: 8/6/2009 The Development Review Division
(DRD) is responsible for reviewing building and land use permit
applications for consistency with the Jefferson County Comprehensive
Plan and Unified Development Code (UDC). Among the types of
projects that DRD reviews are building permits, land divisions,
zoning issues, current use tax, shoreline permits, stormwater
management (clearing & grading), and forest practice conversions
(Class IV-General FPA). DRD
planners are assigned to cases involving Master Permit Applications. Project planners are available to answer questions
related to your application and will be able to accommodate your
request within the time limits presented by their
caseloads.
Each day of the week a DRD
planner is assigned to be the "Planner of the
Day" or "POD."
The POD planner is available to answer general questions about
permit procedures and pending applications.
"POD" Schedule: POD
services are available from
9:00 AM to 1:00 PM during the work
week, except Wednesdays, when the schedule switches to 1:30
PM to 4:30 PM.
The POD planner will also respond to phone calls and emails.
See DRD staff list below.
Pre-Application
Conference: For a greater
level of detail, a customer may want to or be required to request a Pre-Application
Conference (see description and Pre-App. Request Form on the Permit
Information & Application Forms page).
For matters related to the
Port Ludlow Master Planned Resort, visit the
Port Ludlow MPR page.

Development Review
Division Staff
- Stacie Hoskins,
Planning Manager, 379-4463
-
Zoe Ann Lamp,
Associate Planner,
385-9406
-
David Johnson, Associate
Planner -Port Ludlow, 379-4465
-
Michelle Farfan,
Associate Planner-FHM, 379-4457
-
Donna Frostholm,
Associate Planner/Wetland Scientist, 379-4466
- Colleen Zmolek, Assistant Planner, 379-4462
- Email:
developmentreview@co.jefferson.wa.us

Unified Development Code (UDC)
Link to the UDC
text, including the 1989
Shoreline Master Program (SMP) currently in effect. Effective
January 16, 2002, the UDC is the
set of development regulations that implement the 1998 Comprehensive
Plan, as amended. The UDC provides the performance, use, and development
standards by which DRD planners review land use applications.
The UDC also contains
Jefferson County's regulatory protections for "critical
areas," such as critical aquifer recharge areas, geologically
hazardous areas, wetlands and fish and wildlife habitat conservation
areas.
The SMP implements the
Shoreline Management Act
in conjunction with the State Department of Ecology. For more
information on shoreline management, visit the
Shoreline Management & Planning page.
For more information about how
the County development regulations work, read about
permit types and review process below, consult the
Land
Use Permit Information Sheets, and visit the websites linked from
the Web
Links page.
UDC
Amendments - A link to information on the process for
amending the UDC, as coordinated by Long-Range
Planning.

Categories
of UDC Permit Types
The
UDC groups land use permits required by the County into several
different permit types for processing, almost all of which utilize
the Master Permit Application. The purpose for requiring a
permit to conduct a certain land use is to ensure that the proposed
use is compatible with the policies of the Jefferson County
Comprehensive Plan and the regulations of the UDC. The Comprehensive Plan and the
UDC are accessible
from the website and available for review or purchase at the DCD Permit Center in
Port Townsend. A
list of the individual permits issued under the UDC is
found below.
The
Master Permit Application is required for all permits issued under
the UDC, except for Evaluations of Existing Onsite Sewage Systems (EES)
that are only for the sale or transfer of property.
Types
of Permits
Type
I Permit
— This is an administrative permit (i.e., approved or denied by
the UDC Administrator within DCD).
If the proposal is categorically exempt under the State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), there is no public notice of the
permit application. However, if a Type I permit is not categorically
exempt under SEPA, then notice of the application is required and
written comments regarding the proposed project from agencies and
the public are accepted and considered.
In all cases, there is no public hearing required on the
application. Proposals
that include elements within the jurisdiction of other agencies,
such as the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, are
forwarded to those agencies for a minimum 14-day comment period.
Type
II Permit
— This is an administrative permit (i.e., approved or denied by
the UDC Administrator within DCD).
Public notice of the application is required and written
comments regarding the proposed project are accepted and considered.
There is no public hearing required on these types of
applications, except for “C(d)” uses, which may require a public
hearing and final decision by the Hearing Examiner, if deemed
necessary by the Administrator, or if the Administrator’s final
decision on a project application is appealed, in which case a
public hearing is held and the final decision is made by the Hearing
Examiner.
Type
III Permit
— This type of permit application is discretionary in nature and
requires public notice and a public hearing before the Jefferson
County Hearing Examiner. The
Hearing Examiner makes the final permit decision (except for certain
types of shoreline permits), unless appealed.
If the project decision is appealed, then a closed-record
hearing is held and final decision is made by the Appellate Hearing
Examiner.
Type
IV Permit
— This type of permit application is ministerial in nature and
does not require public notice or a public hearing (i.e., final
plats). The final
decision is made by the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners at a
regularly scheduled meeting.
Type
V Permit
— This type of permit application is legislative in nature.
It involves review by the Jefferson County Planning
Commission, which makes a recommendation to the Board of County
Commissioners. Public notice and a public hearing are required before the
Planning Commission. The
final decision is made by the Board of County Commissioners.
For
more information on Type V Permits or legislative actions, visit
the Long-Range Planning page.
list of county
land use permits by permit type with code reference
Note:
The UDC is codified as Title 18
of the Jefferson County Code (JCC). All previous UDC
references (e.g., Section 2 Definitions) are no longer in use.
|
Type I Permits |
Refer
to: |
| Septic Permit/Evaluation of Existing
System (EES) |
JCC
Section 18.30.040(1) and Title 8, Chapter 8.15 |
| Building/Demolition
Permit |
JCC
Section 18.15.040 and Table 3-1 |
|
Allowed
"Yes" Use Consistency Analysis |
JCC
Section 18.15.040 and Table 3-1 |
| Home
Business |
Table 3-1
and JCC Section 18.20.200 |
| Stormwater
Management |
JCC
Section 18.30.070 |
| Road
Access |
JCC
Section 18.30.080 |
| Boundary
Line Adjustment |
JCC
Chapter 18.35 Article II |
| Minor
PRRD Amendments |
JCC Chapter 18.15 Article VI-M |
| Sign
Permit |
JCC
Section 18.30.150 |
| Site
Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD) |
JCC
Chapter 18.40 Article VII |
| Shoreline
Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions |
JCC
Chapter 18.25 |
|
Temporary Use (based on use may be Type II or Type III) |
JCC
Sections 18.20.380 and 18.20.390 |
|
|
|
Type
II Permits |
Refer to: |
|
Discretionary “D” or Unnamed Use Classification |
JCC
Sections 18.15.040(2), 18.15.045 and Table 3-1 |
|
Cottage Industry |
JCC
Section 18.20.170 and Table 3-1 |
|
Short Plat, Preliminary and Final |
JCC
Chapter 18.35 Article III |
|
Binding Site Plan |
JCC
Chapter 18.35 Article V |
|
Conditional (Administrative) “C(a)” Use |
JCC Table
3-1 and Chapter 18.40 Article VIII |
|
Conditional (Discretionary) “C(d)” Use |
JCC Table
3-1 and Chapter 18.40 Article VIII (Discretionary Permit Review
Process Determined by Administrator) |
| Variance,
Minor |
JCC
Chapter 18.40 Article IX |
| Wireless
Telecommunication |
Ordinance
06-0712-99 (UDC Appendix C) |
| Shoreline
Substantial Development (Primary Use) |
JCC
Chapter 18.25 |
| Forest
Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium/Release for Single-Family
Residence |
JCC
Section 18.20.160(5)(c) |
| Appeal |
JCC
Chapter 18.40 Article V and Section 18.40.840 SEPA |
|
|
|
Type
III Permits |
Refer
to: |
|
|
|
Conditional “C” Use |
JCC
Chapter 18.40 Article VIII |
|
Long Plat, Preliminary* |
JCC
Chapter 18.35 Article IV |
|
Planned Rural Residential Development Preliminary Approval (PRRD)
and Major Amendments |
JCC
Chapter 18.15 Article VI-M (must be in conjunction with an
underlying land division application) |
|
Plat Vacation/Alteration |
JCC
Chapter 18.35 Article I |
|
Variance, Major |
JCC
Chapter 18.40 Article IX |
|
Reasonable Economic Use Variance |
JCC
Section 18.15.220 |
|
Wireless Telecommunication |
Ordinance
06-0712-99 (JCC Chapter 18.42) |
|
Shoreline Management Substantial Development, Secondary Use |
JCC
Chapter 18.25 |
|
Shoreline Management Conditional Use |
JCC
Chapter 18.25 |
|
Shoreline Management Variance |
JCC
Chapter 18.25 |
|
Appeal |
JCC
Chapter 18.40 Article V and Section 18.40.840 SEPA |
|
|
|
Type
IV Permits |
Refer
to: |
|
|
| Long
Plat, Final |
JCC
Chapter 18.35 Article IV |
| PRRD,
Final |
JCC Chapter 18.15
Article VI-M |
|
|
|
Type
V Permits |
Refer
to: |
|
|
| Special
Use (Essential Public Facilities) |
JCC
Section 18.15.110 |
| Jefferson
County Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment |
JCC
Chapter 18.45 |
| Jefferson
County Shoreline Master Program Amendment |
CC Chapter
18.25 |
For
information on the fees
associated with the permits listed above, visit
the
Permit
Information & Application Forms page.

Permit
Review and Approval Process
All
permits, including applications for allowed “Yes” uses such as
residential building permits, are subject to a planner-conducted
land use analysis that includes review for consistency with UDC
development standards, environmentally sensitive areas, and
stormwater provisions.
Process
by Permit Type
Pre-application
conferences with DCD staff are required for all Type II and III
permit applications and for certain Type I permits (see the
Pre-Application Conference request form) to orient applicants with
the provisions, procedures and criteria for permit approval required
by the UDC.
After
a pre-application conference (if required), and an application and
the applicable fees are submitted, DCD has 28 days to determine if
the application is substantially complete.
If it is not complete, the applicant has 90 days to provide
all the missing information.
Once
the application is complete, DCD issues a notice of application (if
required) and, following a minimum 14-day public comment period,
issues a determination pursuant to the State Environmental Policy
Act (SEPA). If a
determination of non-significance is issued (DNS), in most cases,
public notice of the determination and of the application will be
posted on the property, mailed to the adjacent property owners, and
published in the newspaper. If
a determination of significance (DS) is issued, the applicant would
begin preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
Appeals of SEPA threshold determinations (except for a DS) on
most project permits may be made to the Jefferson County Hearing
Examiner. An optional
DNS process will be utilized in most cases which allows for early
notification of the “likely” SEPA threshold determination to be
included with the notice of application.
Generally,
DCD has 120 days or less to issue a permit decision once the
application has been determined to be complete.
However, this does not include time required for preparation
of an EIS, if required, or any period during which the applicant has
been requested to provide additional information or if substantial
project revisions have been made to the application.
Type
I Permit
— After the public comment period for applications that involve
SEPA review or the agency comment period for proposals that are
within the jurisdiction of other agencies, the Administrator
determines whether the project is consistent with the criteria for
approval and may approve, approve with conditions, or deny the
application. The Administrator’s action on the permit (except for
administrative code interpretations) may only be appealed to
Superior Court.
Type
II Permit
— After the public comment period, the Administrator reviews the
proposal and determines whether the project is consistent with the
criteria for approval in the UDC and may approve, approve with
conditions, or deny the application.
For “C(d)” uses, the Administrator will review the
potential impacts of the proposal and, upon determining the
application to be complete, make a determination as to whether a
public hearing should be required on the application.
The Administrator’s final decision on the permit may be
appealed to the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner by filing a
written appeal and appropriate fee within 14 days of the decision.
Type
III Permit
— After the public comment period, DCD staff will schedule a
public hearing before the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner and
prepare a staff report prior to the hearing.
The staff report will analyze whether the proposed project is
consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and the
provisions of the UDC. At
the public hearing, the Hearing Examiner will review the staff
report, the applicant’s presentation, and all public comment and
testimony. Within 10
days after the close of the hearing, the Hearing Examiner will
determine whether the proposal is consistent with the applicable
criteria for approval in the UDC and may approve, approve with
conditions, or deny the application.
The Hearing Examiner’s final decision on the permit may be
appealed by a party of record within 14 days to a Jefferson County
Appellate Hearing Examiner by filing a written appeal and
appropriate fee.
Type
IV Permit
— The Board of County Commissioners will determine whether the
requirements granted under preliminary plat approval have been
satisfied in granting final plat approval.
The Board’s action on the permit may only be appealed to
Superior Court.
Type
V Permit
— With certain limitations, Comprehensive Plan amendments may only
be made once a calendar year and must conform to the “docketing”
schedule established in Section 9 of the UDC.
Amendments to the UDC itself (if consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan) may occur more frequently.
In all cases, a staff report from DCD will be prepared to
analyze the proposed amendments for consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan and the Washington state Growth Management Act.
Staff will schedule a public hearing before the Jefferson
County Planning Commission. Upon
the close of the hearing, the Planning Commission will make a
recommendation on the proposed amendments to the Board of County
Commissioners. The
Board will make the final decision on the proposed amendments.
Appeals of the Board’s decision on Comprehensive Plan or
UDC amendments may be made to the Western Washington Growth
Management Hearings Board (WWGMHB).
For
more information on Type V Permits or legislative actions, visit
the Long-Range Planning page.
|